Tampilkan postingan dengan label Jennie S Bev. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Jennie S Bev. Tampilkan semua postingan

Minggu, 19 Mei 2013

15 years after the May tragedy


15 years after the May tragedy
Jennie S Bev ;  An Author and Columnist based in California
JAKARTA POST, 14 Mei 2013

This year, we are commemorating 15 years since the May 1998 tragedy in Indonesia and 12 years since the 9/11 tragedy in New York. These two incidents marked important milestones in many people’s lives. The former woke me up from innocence and the latter shifted my view that no place was a utopia, not even the US, the land of second chances. 

 Both tragedies reminded us of how fragile human beings are. As individuals, as groups, and as members of imagined communities, human beings are never completely disconnected from each other. A singular act of kindness or evil can create ripple effects that travel through time and space. 

Think of ourselves as tiny moving dots. One move can create a small movement of other tiny dots. And those dots number 7 billion in total. How powerful. Any bump among these dots can create an explosion. More bumps, more explosions. 

I witnessed the May 1998 riots in Jakarta, where houses and buildings were burned to the ground, belongings were looted, and women were gang-raped. 

There were too many casualties to mention, for one raped woman, one death, or one robbery was already one too many. And I must deal with the trauma and “survivor’s guilt” for as long as I live.

There are several “theories” on what triggered that tragedy, who masterminded it, and why it occurred. Too many questions have gone unanswered. Too many tears were shed. Too many families have lost their loved ones and hard-earned wealth. No closure has been reached because the alleged perpetrators have not been justly punished.

For what? For satisfying a few heartless and greedy politicians? 

Sure, we can easily blame the failure of Indonesia’s nation building and the Asian financial crisis in 1997, which uncovered a substandard banking system and monetary policies and served to create financial crisis in many families. 

Others blame Indonesia’s exclusive pluralism and hidden segregation among ethnicities and religious followers, which enraged the poor and the marginalized when they could no longer afford to live.

A concoction of those elements created a lethal, combustible combination that was the May 1998 tragedy.

Three years and four months later, on Sept. 11th, another tragedy occurred 10 thousand miles away from Jakarta. I visited the World Trade Center in New York that summer and looked on in disbelief when the TV aired clips of two passenger airplanes plunging into the twin towers. 

 Both incidents taught me several things. First, no place is perfect. A place can be both utopian and dystopian within a blink of an eye. Second, human beings are connected at various levels. We are attached through an invisible string that encircles us and makes us the human race. 

Third, corrupt power tends to use violence in sustaining existing power and acquiring more power, as Weberians would attest. 

Fourth, the pain, the trauma, and the shift of consciousness resulted from witnessing and experiencing first hand a humanitarian tragedy lasts a lifetime. 

Today, with so many violent incidents in the world, such as the mass shooting of 20 elementary students in Newton last December, the Boston Marathon bombings, killing three innocent people and injuring 175 others, and the rape of a 5-year-old child in India recently, I have come to realize that the risks involved in living in modern world have multiplied considerably. Things can change in an instant. Returning to the state of equilibrium is probably an obsolete concept, for volatility is the “new normal”.

Religions and ideologies have been used to justify disturbed individuals for using violence to achieving their goals. 

Some violent incidents do not even have any religious or ideological justification. Sometimes, a violent incident merely results from failures: society’s failure in helping an individual or an individual’s failure in conforming to the majority.

Modern society is amazingly complex. An act could be small and overlooked, yet it has the potential to trigger cruel, subsequent acts. And we sometimes contribute to the intertwining web of human complexities, either directly or indirectly.

May victims and survivors of the May 1998 tragedy be blessed with peace, fairness and justice, soon. 

Selasa, 03 Januari 2012

2012 outlook and maintaining sustainability


2012 outlook and maintaining sustainability
Jennie S. Bev , AN AUTHOR, ENTREPRENEUR AND ADJUNCT PROFESSOR
BASED IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
Sumber : JAKARTA POST, 3 Januari 2012



The year 2012 is here. Is it a time to celebrate or to get ready for another calamity? The United States started this economic implosion in 2008; next was Europe; now India and China have been showing signs of declining growth.

Obama has failed Americans with his inability to uplift the economy and increase jobs by over-expanding the government, over-spending and under-performing. 2011 presented a gloomy picture for the western part of the world.

Whether 2012 will be a better year for the global economy, no one knows for sure. Most notable economists like Paul Krugman, Robert Reich, Michael Spence, Joseph Stiglitz and Nouriel Roubini agreed that 2012 would offer a 50-50 chance of global and US recession. So, at this point, whether you’re an optimist or a pessimist, you have an equal standing.

The good news is, it is more likely Asian countries, including Indonesia, will do better than the US and Europe.

With a rosy World Bank forecast on Indonesia’s growth at 6.2 percent and Nouriel Roubini’s affirmation on Indonesia’s continued growth, we can take a quick break from worrying.

But Indonesia’s growth is sustained and limited by cheap labor (70 US cents to US$1 per hour minimum wage) and the accelerated depletion of non-renewable resources imposing extremely high social costs.

Thus, Asia could be the backbone of the world economy, right? Not that fast, according to Paul Krugman, quoted in an interview with Bloomberg. China’s economy isn’t big enough to be the backbone of the world’s economy as it’s only a little larger than Japan’s.

Whether Indonesia can ever replace China, it’s also too early to tell, even though some optimistic economists see a good opportunity for Indonesia to replace India in the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) grouping.

During the first days of 2012, should we be happy with Indonesia’s economic outlook this year? Absolutely.

We can see growth over the next five, or even 10 years, as long as many things remain more or less the same (ceteris paribus), because many things, literally, can be physically improved in Indonesia.

Indonesia’s maritime and other renewable tourism opportunities haven’t been properly explored, for example. Other intangible areas can be developed as well.

My article titled “Developed Indonesia and Third World America” published on Oct. 17, 2010 in The Jakarta Post hypothesized the possibility for Indonesia to switch places with the US in 20 years’ time.

This may well be proved true, if Indonesia can learn from economic cycles and train its human resources with proper skills. (Please keep this article, so we can compare notes in 2031).

The thing is there are some correlations to be cautious about.

First, the lower an awareness about human rights the lower the wages. This means when Indonesia’s human rights are better respected, wages are expected to increase as well.

For instance, Electrolux closed its manufacturing plant in Michigan due to high wages of $15 to $18 per hour. They shipped out production jobs to Mexico, where the hourly wage is a mere $1.50.

The governor of Michigan’s offer in significant tax breaks wasn’t significant enough to keep the jobs at home. Human rights are much respected in the US, where wages are 10 to 20 times those of similar jobs elsewhere.

Second, low wages and low raw material prices likely have an inverse correlation with social costs. This means the lower the final product cost, the higher the long-term social costs that the producing and the consuming societies are likely to bear.

This explains that a mass-produced piece of clothing may only be priced $8 retail in a department store, but the detrimental effects of low wages and the exploitation of the environment for quick profits on long-term health, quality of life and resources depletion are likely to be tenfold or more.

While thinking about what could happen two decades ahead may sound too far-fetched, we should understand that whatever we do today creates an impact later.

It’s just the law of nature that everything goes in cycles, which we should respect and be aware of. It would be impossible to keep exploiting nature without experiencing the consequences.

Global warming, for instance, is a clear consequence of ignoring the greenhouse effect, prior to causing a massive destruction of nature.

Political will will make a huge difference on whether Indonesia and the world will be able to sustain long-term prosperity. Interestingly, based on my limited observation, politicians and legislators in both Indonesia and the US have “lost interest” in performing their caretaking responsibilities.

Many political decisions are based upon short-term solutions and quickly increasing the bottom line – which oftentimes means the 1-percenters’ bottom line.

Must we place our future in the hands of short-sighted politicians and legislators? Aren’t there other options? The economy is global; we can’t live alone.

One small mistake in policy-making can create a gigantic calamity causing social destruction on a massive scale. Yet, it is on human nature and our own behavior that we must rely.

I long for many things these days: security, prosperity, trust and optimism.